VIRGIN IN THE VOLCANO

"You don't get the virgin into the volcano by telling her you'll push her in."

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Cross

I spent most of Halloween ignoring the huge parade through the gayborhood, ignoring The Brother and Gay/Not-Gay Boyfriend/Not-Boyfriend, and just quietly talked to a conservative crossdresser from the suburbs who wore a red plastic French maid's dress trimmed in cotton lace at the neck and hemlines to keep him cool. He was alone and eager to talk, especially because I asked lots of questions and was a captive audience. He spoke with a kind of detailed particularity that was both fascinating and alarming. In the same measured, calm voice, each word distinct and separate out of his throat, he told me that he was 5'10", 195 lbs., with 13" forearms and 24" thighs, and he was wearing the Bali 3300 bra and Cristian Dior Rouge 644. He talked about his body the way some guys talk about car engines, and when I said as much to him, he lit into a red-rimmed smile and told me he worked as a machinist.

From the beginning of our conversation, he used the words transgender, transvestite, and crossdresser nearly interchangeably, and at some point I stopped to ask him about that and played dumb to get him to define each term. Surprisingly, he really couldn't--the definitions he offered were muddled and overlapping and seemed to focus on physical expression only, not an underlying gender identity. Something about his muddiness really clicked for me. The thing is, I've never trusted what crossdressers typically say to explain their behaviors. The standard line is about embracing their feminine side, about being brave enough to transcend gendered stereotypes and temporarily live as their more nurturing, softer selves. Frankly, I think that's bullshit. While straight male crossdressers obsess about outdated, exaggerated female forms that take hours to put together, real women in sweatpants and greasy hair are doing the housework and running errands and taking care of all the other responsibilities crossdressers have put on hold in order to shop for size 12 stilletos. The guy I was talking to fucking did a "dry run" of his eye makeup two weeks ago. There's nothing nurturing about this kind of behavior, it's narcissism at its finest.

Which is not to say that there is anything wrong with narcissism per se. I indulge plenty of my own oddities. I'm clearly selfish. I just want people to call shit like it is. What I liked about this guy is that I think he was more honest than most. He admitted that crossdressing for him is a sexual impulse. In sixth grade, while dressing up as a woman for Halloween, he first realized he got off on this when the bra he wore all night chafed a raw spot on his rib cage and he liked it. He's collected vintage bras ever since, and of course he rattled off dozens by brand and model number. Throughout the night he reached down to finger the abrasion where his garter belt and the edge of his girdle met.

I suspect though that crossdressing is far more than a sexual fetish. I think these men, for all of their conservative values (and they are REALLY conservative--Republican voting, gun carrying, total warhounds), are at their core self-loathing and unable to voice the real face of their desires. Perhaps, had they had more liberal inclinations or grown up among families who weren't card-carrying members of the NRA, they'd eventually admit to being gay or trans. Instead, they walk around pretending that crossdressing is merely a hobby, merely an escapist pastime that takes up only a fraction of their real lives. At night, they drive to bondage and fetish clubs on the Eastside or in the Valley, and during the day they hide out in the suburbs, purportedly thankful that they don't live among the liberal freaks in a place like Weho.

In the end, what I learned from Halloween night is that I don't like a Republic man in a dress any more than I like a Republican man in pants. But I do appreciate the opportunity to have talked to this man, and more so, his patience and kindness with my many questions.

6 comments:

WillibaldoEa said...

I just want people to call shit like it is.

Amen, Mr. Sister! It astounds me how much people hide from the truth. And not the very private truths they might hold dear. I understand wanting to keep those to oneself. But to call something by a name other than that which it has been given seems dishonest is the most horrible of ways. It's why I hate PC terms and want to vomit every time an undergrad talks about "the global south" or something equally vague bullshit.

I get that being un-PC can be offensive, but I find it more offensive for someone to act insincerely kind because it's what's PC and "proper." I find that the most offensive of all.

So I applaud your cross-dresser for owning his shit. I wish more people did, because at least then we could look them in the face and tell them why we like or dislike them and know that there was no bullshit on either side.

But, then again, much like your cross-dresser's clothes, language is all about keeping up appearances, and we don't often question the words with which people clothe themselves for what they hide beneath, or for the edges at which they silently poke.

Virgin In The Volcano said...

"Language is all about keeping up appearances." LOVE IT.

To be fair, I get that it's hard to be entirely honest with oneself, but I think I get pissed off by cross dressers frequently because their pretending isn't just about them--it affects the women that they've married, the children they've chosen to have. I think you're allowed to live in a world of your own creation, but you shouldn't force others to live in that world with you unless they can make an informed choice to do so.

WillibaldoEa said...

I see what you're saying, and I mostly agree; but wouldn't you say that these cross dressers inhabit two worlds? Not in some weird, theory-bs kind of way, but seriously. They often have cross dressing personas and all that stuff.

So maybe I'd amend what you've said, because it's not about forcing families (husbands and much as wives) to inhabit these worlds, as far as from what I can tell. It's about feeling the need to have two lives because one (oftentimes what's felt to be the "truth") needs to be concealed and lived with some degree of shame, and the other (intended as a cover, we could assume, but including others and their lives) is lived in the open but experienced as a sham.

This need for two lives is what worries me most, and I think it has more to do with us all than it does with that individual. Because they might be causing the harm (if we think of it that way), but I feel the two lives are intended more for us than for them.

Virgin In The Volcano said...

I have to disagree, Poodle. Like so many others, this guy hadn't told his wife, and when she found out years later, they divorced. His 18 year old son still doesn't know. The members of his community don't know. You can't lie to a woman for 10 years and then blame her for leaving. She had a right to know who she was marrying and to make a choice. Deception is deception, and a certain amount of obfuscation in the world at large may be one thing, but to deceive the people you're intimate with is selfish and cruel, even if unintentionally so. Forget about cross dressing specifically--how would you feel if the person you loved had an entire separate life that they hid from you?

WillibaldoEa said...

We're talking past each other here, Kiki. I agree with what you say, but what I'm taking issue with is why people feel the need to create these elaborate lies. Why this man can't just be who he wants to be - why he feels the need to have a family, or why he feels he can't have a family and be who he is - is what bugs me, and I think it has more to do with the fact that society at large doesn't allow a place for a person like him to either be himself or to be both a father/husband and cross dress. I realize that this may be a bit of an idealization, but it's what makes sense to me. Why we have to hide - for whom, for what - is what I think is more important to ask.

So he should be held accountable for lying to those around him and for implicating them in his lie. But how and why did he get there to begin with?

Anonymous said...

Was it a coincidence you chose the subject of cross-dressing around the time of the premiere of J. Edgar?